SEMANTIC AND TEXTUAL RESEARCH OF MODERN CONFLICTOGENIC TEXTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the research is determined by the challenges of wartime – the presence of numerous media publications and posts in social networks, which require special knowledge in the field of linguistics to clarify the circumstances of a criminal offense. The results of the
linguistic analysis may be considered during the preparatory stage of the court proceedings.
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the specifics of semantic and textual research of conflictogenic content during the full-scale military invasion of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine.
Methods. Scientific and linguistic methods, including component analysis, semantic and textual analysis, linguo-stylistic analysis, pragmatic analysis of the communicative situation, contextual and interpretive analysis, are applied to interpret the text fragments regarding the presence of signs of justification, legitimization, denial of aggression or occupation of foreign lands, and glorification of individuals.
Results. The article draws attention to the problematic issues of linguistic examination, scientific and methodological support of linguistic examination, practical application of expert procedures in various types of examinations of conflictogenic media texts, social media posts, and anti-Ukrainian Internet publications.
It was found that in connection with the full-scale invasion of Russia, the scope of conflicts that require a linguistic assessment has been expanded by content with signs of justification, legitimization, denial of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, justification, legitimization, denial of the temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine, glorification of the Russian Federation persons who carried out an act of armed aggression against Ukraine, etc. The conceptual and
terminological apparatus of semantic-textual research regarding the presence of linguistic signs of language conflicts is outlined, and linguistic markers (semantic and textual means) of their expression are identified and described.
Originality. The originality of the scientific search lies in the expansion of the concept of “conflictogenic text” and the inclusion in the sphere of linguistic conflicts of situations related to justification, legitimization, denial of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine,
justification, legitimization, denial of the temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine, glorification of the Russian Federation persons who carried out an act of armed aggression against Ukraine, etc. The practical application of the results of linguistic analysis during the preparatory stage of court proceedings is important.
Conclusion. It was concluded that in the conditions of a full-scale war there is an increased need to conduct semantic and textual studies of conflictogenic texts with signs of justification, legitimization, denial of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, justification, legitimization, denial of the temporary occupation of part of the territory of Ukraine and glorification of the Russian
Federation persons who carried out an act of armed aggression against Ukraine, etc. The analysis of the anti-Ukrainian internet publications submitted for linguistic analysis confirms the presence of linguistic markers of conflictogenic content. We see the prospect of further scientific research in the study of other types of language conflicts that demonstrate collaborative activity.
Article Details
References
Azhniuk, B. M. (2016). Linhvistychna ekspertyza yak naukovo-doslidnyi zhanr [Linguistic
examination as a scientific and research genre]. In: Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza [Forensics and forensic
examination]: Mizhvidomchyi naukovo-metodychnyi zbirnyk. Kyiv, 61, 550–558 (in Ukr.).
Azhniuk, L. V. (2012). Linhvistychna ekspertyza: status: metodolohichni prezumptsii [Linguistic
examination: status and methodological presumptions]. In: Movoznavstvo [Linguistics], 3, 47–64 (in Ukr.).
Artykutsa, N. V. (2017). Stan, problemy y osnovni napriamy rozvytku linhvoekspertnoi diialnosti
[State, problems and main directions of development of linguistic expert activity]. In: Ukrainska mova v
yurysprudentsii: stan, problemy, perspektyvy [Ukrainian language in jurisprudence: state, problems, prospects]:
materialy ХІІІ Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 30 lystop. 2017 r.): u 2 ch. Kyiv: Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav, 1, 20–24 (in Ukr.).
Bilokonenko, L. A. (2010). Problematyka konfliktolohii v suchasnomu movoznavstvi [Problems of
conflictology in modern linguistics.]. In: Filolohichni studii: Naukovyi visnyk Kryvorizkoho derzhavnoho
pedahohichnoho universytetu [Philological studies: Scientific bulletin of Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University],
, 5–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31812/filstd.v4i0.923 (in Ukr.).
Bohoslovska, M. O. (2009). Deiaki aspekty sudovo-linhvistychnoi ekspertyzy [Some aspects of
forensic linguistic examination]. In: Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy [Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of
Ukraine], 152, 152–158 (in Ukr.).
Vasylenko, V. A. (2008). Linhvoiurydychna ekspertyza konfliktohennoho tekstu: kulturomovnyi
aspekt [Linguistic and legal examination of a conflictogenic text: the cultural and linguistic aspect]. In: Filolohichni
nauky [Philological sciences]: zb. nauk. prats. Sumy: SumDPU im. A. S. Makarenka, 3–7 (in Ukr.).
Haponchuk, V. V. (2018). Kvalifikatsiia repostu yak publichnykh zaklykiv do vchynennia
zlochynnykh dii abo rozpovsiudzhennia materialiv, shcho mistiat taki zaklyky [Qualification of repost as public
calls to commit criminal acts or distribution of materials containing such calls.]. In: Visnyk Lvivskoho torhovelnoekonomichnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky [Bulletin of the Lviv University of Trade and Economics. Legal
sciences], 7, 154–162 (in Ukr.).
Dovzhenko, O. V. & Kovkina, Ye. V. (2011). Aktualni pytannia pidhotuvannia materialiv dlia
provedennia avtoroznavchoi ekspertyzy [Topical issues of preparation of materials for authorship examination]. In:
Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky [Theory and practice of forensic examination and
criminology], 11, 265–270 (in Ukr.).
Honcharenko, V. H. & Hora, I. V. (Eds.) (2015). Ekspertyzy u sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Examinations
in the judiciary of Ukraine]: nauk.-prakt. posib. Kyiv: Yurinkom-Inter, 504 (in Ukr.).
Karimsakova, R. (2007). Lingvisticheskaya bezopasnost [Linguistic security]. In: Sto situatsii – sto
konsultatsii. V pomoshch zhurnalistam [One hundred situations – one hundred consultations. To help journalists].
Almati: Izdatelstvo OFPPI «Interligal», 41–65 (in Russ.).
Kovkina, Ye. V. (2022). Teoretychni i praktychni aspekty vyvchennia komunikatyvnoho aktu
pryiniattia propozytsii vyhody v suchasnii linhvistychnii ekspertyzi movlennia [Theoretical and practical aspects of
study of the communicative act of acceptance of the benefit offer in modern linguistic examination of speech]. In:
Movoznavchyi visnyk [Linguistic Bulletin]. Cherkasy: Vydavets FOP Hordiienko Ye. I., 32, 164–170 (in Ukr.).
Kompantseva, L. F. (2018). Linhvistychna ekspertyza sotsialnykh merezh [Linguistic examination of
social networks]: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: Ahrar MediaHrup, 318 (in Ukr.).
Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Code of Ukraine]: vid 05.04.2001 r. № 2341-III (redaktsiia
12.2022 r.). Available at: https://protocol.ua/ua/kriminalniy_kodeks_ukraini/ (in Ukr.).
Shevchenko, L. I. & Syzonov, D. Yu. (2021). Linhvistychna ekspertyza [Linguistic examination]:
pidruchnyk. Kyiv: VPTs «Kyivskyi universytet», 244 (in Ukr.).
Pradid, Yu. F. (2006). Mistse linhvistychnoi ekspertyzy v systemi kryminalistychnykh ekspertyz [The
place of linguistic examination in the system of forensic examination]. In: U tsaryni linhvistyky i prava [In the field
of linguistics and law]. Simferopol: Elino, 194–199 (in Ukr.).
Saplin, Yu. (2002). Movnyi konflikt yak vzaiemodiia osobystostei, sotsialnykh stratehii ta
komunikatyvnykh kultur [Language conflict as an interaction of personalities, social strategies and communicative
cultures]. In: Movni konflikty i harmonizatsiia suspilstva [Linguistic conflicts and harmonization of society]:
materialy naukovoi konferentsii (Kyiv, 28–29 travnia 2001 r.). Available at:
http://ukrlife.org/main/tribuna/confa_21saplin.htm (in Ukr.).
Svyrydova, L. V. (2011). Otsinni sudzhennia eksperta v protsesi vykonannia sudovo-avtoroznavchoi
klasyfikatsiino-diahnostychnoi ekspertyzy [Value judgments of an expert in the process of performing a forensic
classification and diagnostic examination]. In: Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky [Theory and
practice of forensic examination and criminology], 11, 258–265 (in Ukr.).
Shevchenko, L. I. (2017). Linhvistychna ekspertyza mediatekstu: kryterii fakhovoi arhumentatsii
[Linguistic examination of mediatext: criteria of professional argumentation]. In: Odeskyi linhvistychnyi visnyk
[Odesa Linguistic Bulletin]: spetsvypusk, 237–240 (in Ukr.).
Shyrokov, V. A. & Sydorenko, O. O. (2005). Naukovi zasady linhvistychnoi ekspertyzy politychnykh
ta pravovykh dokumentiv. Postanovka problemy [Scientific principles of linguistic examination of political and
legal documents. Formulation of the problem]. In: Movoznavstvo [Linguistics], 2, 18–31 (in Ukr.).
Shytyk, L. V. (2022). Spetsyfika semantyko-tekstualnykh doslidzhen antyukrainskykh internetpublikatsii [The specifics of semantic and textual research of anti-Ukrainian internet publications]. In: Krymskyi
mizhnarodnyi forum: filolohiia ta zhurnalistyka [Crimean International Forum: Philology and Journalism]: zb.
materialiv (20–21 zhovtnia 2022 r., m. Kyiv). Lviv–Torun : Liha-Pres, 127–130 (in Ukr.).