HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF EXPLANATORY CONSTRUCTIONS IN UKRAINIAN LINGUISTICS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The lack of a clear definition of the notion of explanation in the linguistic scientific literature leads to an appeal to the evolution of the formation of views about this category, actualizes the attempt to determine the status of the category of explanation, the means of implementation of which are commensurate with the means of implementation of categories of refinement, separation, semi-prediction, indirect mediating analysis and requires a consistent delineation of these syntactic units. Exploration of explanatory constructs in a simple complicated sentence has been carried out taking into account the achievements of both Ukrainian linguistic and linguistics in general. Issues of explanatory constructions were raised in their writings by I. O. Aksenova, T. A. Alexandrova, I. M. Aribzhanova, N. S. Valgina, I. R. Vychovanets, M. O. Vintonov, S. M.Glazova, K. G. Gorodenska, L. V. Zakharova, O. P. Kadochnikova, E. V. Krotevych, M. Y. Pliushch, A. F. Pryjatkina, O. G. Rudnev, I. I. Slynko, M. M. Shansky and others.
Purpose. To comprehensively analyze the dynamics of the formation of explanatory structures in linguistic studies, to determine their differential and classification features.
Results. In the works of the first half of the nineteenth century there was no coherent theory of explanatory terms. In the scientific studios of that time, the concept explanatory terms was not used in general, but are used by the term separate members of the sentence, identifying it with an appendix (F. I. Buslajev, O. A. Potebnya). In the writings of 70-80 years of the XIX century. Scientist’s views on defining the specimen were changed. Its main feature is considered not attributive, but explanatory, clarifying functions. Scientists distinguish notions of appendix and separation as separate syntactic categories (O. M. Peshkovsky, E. V. Krotevich, B. M. Kulik). In the second half of the twentieth century. the notions of attachment and separation are finally included in linguistic science as separate syntactic categories. In the future, linguists are stepping up their attention to the separation of subordinate clauses of the sentence, in particular, in-depth exploration of the explanatory and refinement functions of separation, emphasize the need to distinguish refinement structures as a separate category, establish the differences between explanatory and refinement units.
Originality. The formation of the category of explanation in Ukrainian linguistics, the role of syntactic constructions with the meaning of explanation and clarification in a simple non-elementary sentence, the features of their differentiation, specifics and purposes are analyzed.
Conclusion. Analyzing the works of leading syntaxists, we can confidently speak about the need to differentiate the concepts of explanation and refinement (T. A. Alexandrova, N. S. Valgina, I. R. Vyhovanets, L. V. Zakharova, A. F. Pryyatkina, I. I. Slуnko, N. M. Shansky). In scientific studies of the late twentieth century – beginning of the XXI century a detailed explanation of the differentiation of explanatory, semi-predictive and syntactically mediated constructions is given (I. O. Aksenova, I. R. Vyhovanets, M. O. Vintonov, K. G. Gorodenska, N. V. Gujvanіuk, O. P. Kadochnikova, M. F. Kobylianska, I. I. Sniveler). Today, linguists continue to research explanatory constructs, stufy out discussion questions, and clarify the scope of this concept.
Article Details
References
Aksonova, I. O. (2017). Syntaksychni konkretyzatory v strukturi rechennia: typolohiino-kvalifikatsiini oznaky [Syntax concretizers in sentence structure: typological and qualifying features]. Filolohichni studii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (9), 55‒59 (in Ukr.).
Аksandrova, T. A. (1974). Utochniaiushchye obosoblennye chleny predlozhenyia [Clarifying the individual members of the seance]. Russkyi yazyk v shkole (2), 15–21 (in Russ.).
Aribzhanova, I. M. (2011). Utochnennia yak syntaksychne poniattia [Clarification as a syntactic concept]. Ukrainske movoznavstvo (42), 59‒73 (in Ukr.).
Babaitseva, V. V., Maksymov, L. U. (1981). Sovremennyi russkyi yazyk. V trekh chastiakh. Ch. III. Syntaksys. Punktuatsyia [Modern Russian language. In three parts. Part III. Syntax. Punctuation]. Moskva : Prosveshchenye, 271 (in Russ.).
Вuslaev, F. I. (1959). Ystorycheskaia hrammatyka russkoho yazyka [Historical grammar of the Russian language]. Moskva : Uchpedhyz, 623 (in Russ.).
Valhіna, N. S. (1973). Syntaksys sovremennoho russkoho yazyka [Syntax of modern Russian language]. Moskva : : Vysshaia shkola, 328 (in Russ.).
Vykhovanets, I. R. (1992). Narysy z funktsionalnoho syntaksysu ukrainskoi movy [Essays on the functional syntax of the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, 224 (in Ukr.).
Vintoniv, M. O. (2013). Communicative structure of sentence and text in Ukrainian literary language. D dissertation (Ukrainian language). Donetsk National University. Donetsk, 423 (in Ukr.).
Vostokov, A. Kh. (1831). Russkaia hrammatyka [Russian grammar]. St. Petersburg, 408 (in Ukr.).
Halkyna-Fedoruk, E. M., Horshkova, K. V., Shanskyi, N. V. (1958). Sovremennyi russkyi yazyk: Syntaksys [Modern Russian: Syntax]. Moskva : Uchpedhіz, 200 (in Russ.).
Hlazova, S. M. (2005). Poiasniuvalno-ototozhniuvalni konstruktsii v ukrainskii movi: semantyka, hramatyka, prahmatyka [Explanatory and identification constructs in Ukrainian: semantics, grammar, pragmatics]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Ukrainian language). G. Skovoroda′s Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Kharkiv, 20 (in Ukr.).
Horodenska, K. H. (2010). Spoluchnyky ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy: [monohrafiia] [Connectors of the Ukrainian literary language]. Kyiv : In-t ukr. movy NAN Ukrainy, Vyd. Dim Dmytra Burahо, 208 (in Ukr.).
Hrammatyka russkoho yazyka. T. 2: Syntaksys. [Grammar of Russian language. Syntax]. (1954). Moskva, 703 (in Russ.).
Hrech, N. I. (1827). Praktycheskaia hrammatyka russkoho yazyka [Practical grammar of the Russian language]. St. Petersburg : Yzd-vo typ. Spb. Vospytatelnoho doma, 376 (in Russ.).
Zakharova, L. V. (2008). Obosoblennye vtorostepennye chleny predlozheniya so znacheniem utochneniya v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke [Separate secondary members of the sentence with the meaning of refinement in the modern Russian literary language ]. PhD dissertation (Russian language). Armavir’s State Pedagogical University. Armavir, 215 (in Russ.).
Kadochnikova, O. P. (2010). Semantyka i struktura polipredykatyvnykh spoluchnykovykh konstruktsii z poiasniuvalnymy vidnoshenniamy [Semantics and structure of polypredictative connective structures with explanatory relationships]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Ukrainian language). V. Vinnichenko’s Kirovograd State Pedagogical University. Kirovograd, 20 (in Ukr.).
Kozachuk, H. O. (2000). Proste uskladnene rechennia. Suchasna ukrainska literaturna mova [A simple complicated sentence. Modern Ukrainian literary language]. Kyiv, 350–366 (in Ukr.).
Krotevіch, E. V. (1948). Obosoblennye syntahmy [Separate syntagmas]. Voprosy slavianskoho yazykoznanyia. Book 1. Lviv : Yzd-vo Lvov. un-ta, 65‒90 (in Russ.).
Kulyk, B. (1965). Kurs suchasnoi ukrainskoi literaturnoi movy. P. II Syntaksys [Contemporary Ukrainian Literary Language Course. Syntax]. Kyiv, 167 (in Ukr.).
Nechui-Levytskyi, I. Hrammatyka ukrainskoi movy [Grammar of the Ukrainian language] P. II. Syntaksys. Available at : http://elib.nlu.org.ua/view.html?&id=9836 (in Ukr.).
Peshkovskyi, А. M. (1956). Russkyi syntaksys v nauchnom osveshchenyy [Russian syntax in scientific lighting]. Moskva : Uchpedhіz, 511 (in Russ).
Pliushch, M. Y. (2004). Vidokremleni chleny rechennia. Vidokremlennia. Ukrainska mova. Entsyklopediia [Separate members of the sentence. Ukrainian language: Encyclopedia]. Kyiv : Nauk. dumka, 78–79 (in Ukr.).
Potebnia, A. A. (1874). Yz zapysok po russkoi hrammatyke. Vvedenie Іn 4 parts. [From notes on Russian grammar. Introduction]. Voronezh, 157 (in Russ.).
Priyatkina, A. F. (1983). Oslozhnennoe prostoe predlozhenye [Complicated simple sentence]. Vladyvostok : DVGU, 96 (in Russ.).
Priyatkina, A. F. (1990). Russkyi yazyk: Syntaksys oslozhnennoho predlozhenyia [Russian language: Complicated sentence syntax]. Moskva : Vysshaia shkola, 176 (in Russ.).
Rudnev, A. H. (1947). Obosoblennye chleny predlozhenіya [Separate proposal members of sentence]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Russian language). Leningrad, 54 (in Russ.).
Rudnev, A. H. (1959). Obosoblennye chleny predlozhenіya v іstorіі russkoho yazyka [Separate sentence members in the history of the Russian language]. Uchenye zapіskі LHPY іm. A. Y. Hertsena. T. 174. Leningrad, 254 (in Russ.).
Shvedova, N. Yu. (Ed.). (1980). Russkaia hrammatyka [Russian grammar]. Moskva : Nauka. 709 (in Russ.).
Serl, Dzh. (1982). Referentsyia kak rechevoi akt [Reference as a speech act]. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Logika і lingvistika (Problemy referencii). Vyp. ХІІІ. Moskva, 179‒202 (in Russ.).
Slynko, I. I., Huivaniuk, N. V., Kobylianska, M. F. (1994). Syntaksys suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. Problemni pytannia [Syntax of the modern Ukrainian language. Problematic issues]. Kyiv : Vyshcha shkola, 670 (in Ukr.).
Bilodid, I. K. (1970‒1980). Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy : in 4 volumes. AN URSR [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka. T. 8, 496 (in Ukr.).
Moisiienko, A. K. (2010). Suchasna ukrainska literaturna mova: Morfolohiia. Syntaksys [Modern Ukrainian literary language: Morphology. Syntax]. Kyiv, 374 (in Ukr.).
Shanskij, N. M. (1985). Russkoe yazykoznanye y lynhvodydaktyka [Russian linguistics and linguodidactics]. Moskva, 239 (in Russ.).